Evaluation and cognitive training of eye tracking technology in right-sided unilateral neglect patients: A case report and literature review

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2023.03.014

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To explore the rehabilitation options for patients with right-sided unilateral neglect complicated with severe cognitive impairment after stroke. Methods Retrospective analysis of one patient with severe cognitive impairment and aphasia accompanied by right-sided unilateral neglect after stroke was conducted for evaluation and cognitive training, and literature review was conducted. Results Eye tracking technology, non-verbal cognitive function assessment and behavioral observation could objectively evaluate the degree of cognitive impairment of patients. Through comprehensive rehabilitation training such as eye tracking training and transcranial direct current stimulation, certain therapeutic effects had been achieved. Conclusion Eye tracking technology combined with cognitive training provides new ideas for the rehabilitation of patients with severe cognitive impairment.

Key words: stoke, unilateral neglect, eye tracking technology, cognitive training

CLC Number:

R743

Zhao Yue, Zhang Shaohua, Zhao Zhenbiao, Yan Yanning, Sun Zengxin, Wang Xiaohan, Lyu Peiyuan, Yin Yu. Evaluation and cognitive training of eye tracking technology in right-sided unilateral neglect patients: A case report and literature review[J]. Clinical Focus, 2023, 38(3): 268-272.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://huicui.hebmu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2023.03.014

https://huicui.hebmu.edu.cn/EN/Y2023/V38/I3/268

Figures/Tables 4

References 26

[1]	Blackburn DJ, Bafadhel L, Randall M, et al. Cognitive screening in the acute stroke setting[J]. Age and Ageing, 2012, 42(1):113-116. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs116 URL
[2]	Verdon V, Schwartz S, Lovblad KO, et al. Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: A study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping[J]. Brain, 2010, 133(3):880-894. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp305 URL
[3]	Bartolomeo P, Thiebaut DSM, Doricchi F. Left unilateral neglect as a disconnection syndrome[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2007, 17(11):2479-2490. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl181 URL
[4]	Floel A, Buyx A, Breitenstein C, et al. Hemispheric lateralization of spatial attention in right-and left-hemispheric language dominance[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2005, 158(2):269-275. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.09.016 URL
[5]	Corbetta M, Kincade MJ, Lewis C, et al. Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect[J]. Nature Neuroscience, 2005, 8(11):1603-1610. doi: 10.1038/nn1574 pmid: 16234807
[6]	Cappon D, Jahanshahi M, Bisiacchi P. Value and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in the cognitive rehabilitation: A critical review since 2000[J]. Front Neurosci, 2016, 10:157.
[7]	程蕊容, 辛秀峰, 刘章佩, 等. 卒中后认知障碍的研究进展[J]. 临床荟萃, 2018, 33(1):89-92.
[8]	李文清, 张珊珊, 徐琨鹏. 眼动仪在认知行为实验中的应用及选择[J]. 软件导刊, 2020, 19(2):80-83.
[9]	姚依妮, 孙建明, 林月华, 等. 眼动追踪技术应用分析[J]. 轻工科技, 2018, 34 (9):80-82.
[10]	康健楠, 韩晓雅, 耿新玲, 等. 基于眼动追踪技术的孤独症谱系障碍儿童面孔异常加工识别研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(7):933-936.
[11]	黄荷. 认知资源投入程度对框架效应影响的眼动研究[D]. 西安: 第四军医大学, 2017.
[12]	杨丽颖, 郑月, 康传依, 等. 眼动追踪技术应用于抑郁障碍患者注意偏向观察的研究进展[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 2021, 21(10):730-734.
[13]	高利影, 吴兴启, 肖桂贤, 等. 阿尔茨海默病患者面孔情绪加工的眼动研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2022, 31(6):534-540.
[14]	Kortman B. Assessing for hemi-spatial neglect using eye tracking glasses[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015, 10(96):e24.
[15]	孙秀丽, 肖尧, 胡国金, 等. 基于作业分析任务导向性训练对脑卒中患者上肢功能的疗效[J]. 临床荟萃, 2021, 36(3):216-219.
[16]	Bodenschatz CM, Skopinceva M, Ruβ T, et al. Attentional bias and childhood maltreatment in clinical depression-An eye-tracking study[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 2019, 112:83-88. doi: S0022-3956(18)31323-2 pmid: 30870713
[17]	Höfler C, Gremsl A, Schienle A. Nocebo and pseudo-neglect: Paradoxical effects detected with eye-tracking[J]. Int J Psychophysiol, 2018, 125:29-34. doi: S0167-8760(17)30582-2 pmid: 29410091
[18]	张轶凡, 李丹丹, 张龙, 等. 孤独症谱系障碍患者社会注意缺陷的眼动追踪研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2022, 31(1):89-94.
[19]	冉丽, 郭志伟, 母其文. 重复经颅磁刺激治疗卒中后认知障碍的研究进展[J]. 临床荟萃, 2021, 36(7):646-650.
[20]	Bang DH, Bong SY. Effect of combination of transcranial direct current stimulation and feedback training on visuospatial neglect in patients with subacute stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27(9):2759-2761. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2759 URL
[21]	Làdavas E, Giulietti S, Avenanti A, et al. a-tDCS on the ipsilesional parietal cortex boosts the effects of prism adaptation treatment in neglect[J]. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2015, 33(5):647-662.
[22]	Veldema J, Bösl K, Neumann G, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation in rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect after stroke[J]. CNS Spectr, 2020, 25(1):38-49. doi: 10.1017/S1092852918001748 URL
[23]	Sparing R, Thimm M, Hesse MD, et al. Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation[J]. Brain, 2009, 132(11):3011-3020. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp154 URL
[24]	Sunwoo H, Kim YH, Chang WH, et al. Effects of dual transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke unilateral visuospatial neglect[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2013, 554:94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.08.064 pmid: 24021804
[25]	Draaisma LR, Wessel MJ, Hummel FC. Non-invasive brain stimulation to enhance cognitive rehabilitation after stroke[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2020(716):133678.
[26]	Živanovi'c M, Paunovi'c D, Konstantinovi'c U, et al. The effects of offline and online prefrontal vs parietal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on verbal and spatial working memory[J]. Neurobiol Learn Mem, 2021, 179:107398. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107398 URL

评定时间	WAB	MFDA	MBI
入院评估	不配合	不配合	0
认知干预前	不配合	不配合	0
认知干预3周后	不配合	不配合	3
认知干预6周后	1.5	不配合	6

评定时间	WAB	MFDA	MBI
入院评估	不配合	不配合	0
认知干预前	不配合	不配合	0
认知干预3周后	不配合	不配合	3
认知干预6周后	1.5	不配合	6

评定时间	MMSE	NLCA	LBT	眼动追踪
入院评估	不配合	不配合		\
认知干预前	不配合	不配合	不配合	左86%右13%
认知干预3周后	不配合	1分	不配合	左73%右27%
认知干预6周后	不配合	5分	不配合	左66%右33%

评定时间	MMSE	NLCA	LBT	眼动追踪
入院评估	不配合	不配合		\
认知干预前	不配合	不配合	不配合	左86%右13%
认知干预3周后	不配合	1分	不配合	左73%右27%
认知干预6周后	不配合	5分	不配合	左66%右33%