临床荟萃

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种镇静镇痛策略辅助治疗重症手足口病机械通气患儿的效果

  

  1. 唐山市妇幼保健院 感染性疾病科,河北 唐山 063000
  • 出版日期:2016-05-05 发布日期:2016-05-04
  • 通讯作者: 田庆玲,Email:tql937@126.com

Effect of two analgesic and sedation strategies in  treating severe handfootmouth children with mechanical ventilation

  1. Department of  Infectious  Diseases, Tangshan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China
  • Online:2016-05-05 Published:2016-05-04
  • Contact: Corresponding author: Tian Qingling, Email: tql937@126.com

摘要: 目的 探讨两种镇静镇痛方案(咪达唑仑、咪达唑仑联合芬太尼)辅助治疗重症手足口病机械通气患儿
的效果。方法 选取本院诊治的重症手足口病患儿190例,均行机械通气治疗,根据治疗方案分为两组,95例患儿应
用咪达唑仑镇静镇痛为M 组,95例患儿应用咪达唑仑联合芬太尼镇静镇痛为M+F组,比较两组患儿的治疗效果。
结果 镇静后,两组患儿镇静程度(Ramsay)评分均在合理的镇静范围。M+F组患儿镇静后2、4、6、8、10、12小时
Ramsay评分更接近理想的镇静终点,与M 组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。两组患儿PAED 评分均显著降
低。随着镇静时间的延长,麻醉苏醒期躁动量化评分表(PAED)评分降低幅度越明显。M+F组患儿镇静后2、4、6、
8、10、12小时PAED评分明显低于M 组(P <0.01)。M+F组患儿自主呼吸时间、睁眼时间、准确完成指令时间、拔
管时间、定向力恢复时间均明显早于M 组(P <0.01)。M+F组患儿机械通气时间、ICU 住院时间、总住院时间均明
显少于M 组(P <0.01)。结论 咪达唑仑联合芬太尼镇静镇痛可明显缓解患儿的疼痛,发挥良好的镇静作用,减轻
躁动,还能缩短苏醒时间和治疗时间,效果显著,值得临床推广使用。

关键词: 手足口病, 呼吸,人工, 深度镇静, 咪达唑仑, 芬太尼

Abstract:

Objective  To investigate the effect of two analgesic and sedation strategies (midazolam and midazolam combined with fentanyl) in treating severe handfootmouth children with mechanical ventilation. Methods  A total of 190 children with severe handfootmouth disease treating with mechanical ventilation were selected. According to treatment program, all patients were divided into two groups, including 95 patients with midazolam  as M   group and 95 patients with midazolam combined with fentanyl as M+F group. Therapeutic effect was compared between both groups. Results  After treatment, ramsay scores were  within a reasonable range in both groups. After sedation of 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h and 12 h, Ramsay score was closer to ideal sedation end point in M+F group than in M group (P<0.01). After sedation, PAED score was significantly decreased in both groups. As sedation time prolonged, PAED score decreased more significantly. After sedation of 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h,10 h and 12 h, PAED score was significantly lower in M+F group than in M group (P<0.01). Spontaneous breathing time, eye opening time, accurately complete instruction time, extubation time and orientation recovery time were significantly earlier in M+F group than in M  group (P<0.01). Mechanical ventilation time, ICU hospitalization time and total hospitalization time were significantly decreased in M+F group than in M group (P<0.01). Conclusion  Midazolam combined with fentanyl can obviously relieve pain, reduce agitation, shorten recovery time and treatment time and it is worthy of clinical use.

Key words: hand, foot and mouth;respiration, artificial  , disease;deep sedation;  , midazolam, fentanyl