临床荟萃

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

氧减指数、StopBang问卷及Epworth嗜睡量表在公交车司机中筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的应用

  

  1. 1.宁波大学医学院,浙江 宁波 315000;2.宁波市第一医院 心身医学科,浙江 宁波 315000
  • 出版日期:2018-12-05 发布日期:2019-01-17
  • 通讯作者: 通信作者:阮列敏,Email:lmruan@tom.com
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省医药卫生科技计划(2017KY136);宁波市社发重大专项(2017C510010)

Application of oxygen desaturation index, StopBang questionnaire and Epworth sleepiness scale in screening of obstructive sleep apnea in bus drivers

  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Ningbo University; 2.Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China
  • Online:2018-12-05 Published:2019-01-17
  • Contact: Corresponding author: Ruan Liemin, Email: lmruan@tom.com

摘要: 目的 评估氧减指数(ODI)、StopBang问卷及Epworth嗜睡(ESS)量表在公交车司机中筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSA)的应用价值。方法 采用便利抽样法选取2016年12月至2018年1月宁波市公交公司伴有打鼾的公交车司机195例,男177例,女18例,完成StopBang问卷、ESS量表,并行连续血氧饱和度监测和多导睡眠图(PSG)监测。根据PSG监测结果将患者分为单纯鼾症组(<5次/h)、轻度OSA组(5~15次/h)、中度OSA组(15~30次/h)、重度OSA组(≥30次/h)。计算两种量表及ODI≥5次/h的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析3种检测方法预测OSA的准确性。结果 在判断OSA时,StopBang问卷的灵敏度最高,ODI的ROC曲线下面积最大,ESS量表的灵敏度最低。联合使用时,StopBang问卷及ODI二者联合诊断正确率最高。结论 在公交车司机中,StopBang问卷及ODI二者联合使用对OSA的评估有较高应用价值。

关键词: 睡眠呼吸暂停, 阻塞性, 氧减指数, 多道睡眠描记术

Abstract: Objective  To evaluate oxygen desaturation index (ODI),  StopBang questionnaire and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) in screening of the bus drivers with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA).Methods  A total of 195 cases of bus drivers with snoring between December 2016 and January 2018 (177 males and 18 females) were randomly selected. StopBang questionnaire, ESS, nocturnal oximetry monitoring and the overnight polysomnography (PSG) monitoring were conducted among them. Based on the severity of OSA which was determined by PSG, the participants were classified into four groups: primary snoring (<5 events/h), mild (-15 events/h ), moderate (-30 events/h ), and severe (≥30 events/h ). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive and the receiver operating characteristics curve of three detection methods were calculated. Results  Using mildmoderatesevere (≥5 events/h), moderatesevere (≥15 events/h), and severe (≥30 events/h) OSA as cutoffs, StopBang questionnaire had the highest sensitivity; ODI had the largest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, while ESS had the lowest sensitivity. Application of StopBang questionnaire, combined with ODI, boasts the highest diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionCombination of StopBang questionnaire with ODI has great value to assess OSA in bus drivers.

Key words: sleep apnea, , obstructive, oxygen desaturation index, polysomnography