临床荟萃 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 405-411.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2023.05.003
收稿日期:
2022-11-21
出版日期:
2023-05-20
发布日期:
2023-07-20
通讯作者:
罗惠娟, Email:feelluo@126.com
基金资助:
Zhang Yuan, Zhou Juan, Li Wenxiang, Liu Jinxiang, Tang Xiaomei, Luo Huijuan()
Received:
2022-11-21
Online:
2023-05-20
Published:
2023-07-20
Contact:
Luo Huijuan, Email:feelluo@126.com
摘要:
目的 比较伴或不伴瘙痒症状的妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症(intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,ICP)患者的不同临床特征,评估瘙痒在妊娠期胆汁淤积症中的意义。方法 359例ICP患者,根据有无瘙痒症状,发病孕周和血清总胆汁酸(total bile acid,TBA)浓度进行分组,随机选取同期产检正常的孕妇设为对照组。评估瘙痒和TBA水平与围产期结局的关系。结果 ICP发生率约1.1%,其中无症状者居多(71.03%)。伴或不伴瘙痒症状的ICP患者肝功能指标、妊娠期糖尿病、新生儿低体重和早产、剖宫产率较对照组增高(P <0.05),3组分娩前脐血流均在正常范围内,ICP组,尤其是有症状ICP组,脐血流值都在正常范围的上限(P<0.05)。轻度、无症状ICP的剖宫产率、早产率在所有分组中最低(P <0.05)。瘙痒症状和TBA浓度与围产期发病率呈正相关,其中 TBA≥40 μmol/L尤为显著。结论 瘙痒不应成为ICP诊断的先决条件,无论有无瘙痒,ICP均增加围产期发病率,但瘙痒和TBA≥40 μmol/L是围产期发病的危险因素。无症状ICP多表现为轻型ICP,但均可无预警发生胎死宫内。因此,妊娠期应定期检查TBA和肝功能,以防止无症状患者漏诊。
中图分类号:
张源, 周娟, 黎文香, 刘金香, 汤小湄, 罗惠娟. 瘙痒与妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症临床预后的关系及风险预测[J]. 临床荟萃, 2023, 38(5): 405-411.
Zhang Yuan, Zhou Juan, Li Wenxiang, Liu Jinxiang, Tang Xiaomei, Luo Huijuan. Correlation between pruritus and the prognosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and prediction of its risks[J]. Clinical Focus, 2023, 38(5): 405-411.
项目 | 对照组 (n=200) | 有症状ICP组 (n=104) | 无症状ICP组 (n=255) | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
年龄(岁) | 30.0(27.0, 33.0) | 29.0(27.0, 33.7) | 30.0(27.0, 33.0) | 0.887 |
孕次(次) | 2.0(1.0, 2.0) | 2.0(1.0, 3.0) | 2.0(1.0, 3.0)* | 0.035 |
分娩次数(次) | 1.0(1.0, 2.0) | 1.0(1.0, 2.0) | 2.0(1.0, 2.0)* | 0.013 |
BMI(kg/m2) | 26.2(24.1, 28.1) | 25.1(23.3, 27.6)* | 25.7(23.5, 27.2) | 0.025 |
胆汁酸异常时胎龄(周) | - | 34.3(30.0, 37.0) | 33.0(24.4, 37.3) | 0.254 |
TBA(μmol/L) | 3.8(2.7, 4.5) | 23.8(15.0, 43.2)* | 21.4(14.5, 31.3)* | <0.01 |
ALT(IU/L) | 12.5(9.0, 14.0) | 46.5(15.3, 159.3)* | 14.0(10.0, 16.0)*# | <0.01 |
AST(IU/L) | 18.0(15.0, 20.0) | 50.5(21.3, 104.3)* | 18.0(15.0, 20.0)# | <0.01 |
TBIL(μmol/L) | 8.2(6.5, 9.0) | 12.3(7.7, 15.5)* | 8.5(7.0, 8.6)*# | <0.01 |
GC(μmol/L) | 2.8(2.2, 3.7) | 18.2(7.9, 35.8)* | 13.2(7.7, 22.6)* | <0.01 |
GDM[例(%)] | 23(11.5) | 26(25.0)* | 58(22.8)* | 0.002 |
脐血流量 | ||||
S/D | 2.1(1.9, 2.3) | 2.4(2.1, 2.7)* | 2.2(2.0, 2.5)*# | <0.01 |
PI | 0.7(0.7, 0.9) | 0.8(0.7, 1.0)* | 0.8(0.7, 0.9)# | 0.002 |
RI | 0.5(0.5, 0.6) | 0.6(0.5, 0.6)* | 0.6(0.5, 0.6) | 0.012 |
早产[例(%)] | 6(3.0) | 30(28.8)* | 47(18.4)*# | <0.01 |
医源性早产 | 0 | 15(14.4)* | 16 (6.3)*# | <0.01 |
自发性早产 | 6(3.0) | 15(14.4)* | 31(12.2)* | 0.001 |
分娩时胎龄(周) | 39.4(38.6, 40.2) | 37.6(36.4, 38.5)* | 38.3(37.2, 39.1)*# | <0.01 |
分娩方式[例(%)] | ||||
剖宫产 | 40(20.0) | 71(68.3)* | 123 (48.2)*# | <0.01 |
阴道助产 | 8(4.0) | 2(1.9) | 6(2.4) | 0.912 |
正常分娩 | 152(76.0) | 31(29.8)* | 126 (49.4)*# | <0.01 |
新生儿体重(g) | 3250(2950, 3450) | 3000(2650, 3200)* | 3000(2700, 3300)* | <0.01 |
新生儿性别(女)[例(%)] | 96(48.0) | 45(43.3) | 124(48.6) | 0.639 |
胎儿宫内窘迫[例(%)] | 31(15.5) | 18(17.3) | 44(17.2) | 0.853 |
羊水异常[例(%)] | 14(7.0) | 21(20.2)* | 26(10.2)# | 0.002 |
MSAF | 11(5.5) | 17(16.4)* | 24(9.4) | 0.008 |
羊水过少 | 3(1.5) | 4(3.8) | 2(0.8) | 0.110 |
新生儿窒息[例(%)] | 3(1.5) | 4(3.8) | 12(4.7) | 0.164 |
表1 3组一般资料比较
Tab.1 Comparison of general data among the three groups
项目 | 对照组 (n=200) | 有症状ICP组 (n=104) | 无症状ICP组 (n=255) | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
年龄(岁) | 30.0(27.0, 33.0) | 29.0(27.0, 33.7) | 30.0(27.0, 33.0) | 0.887 |
孕次(次) | 2.0(1.0, 2.0) | 2.0(1.0, 3.0) | 2.0(1.0, 3.0)* | 0.035 |
分娩次数(次) | 1.0(1.0, 2.0) | 1.0(1.0, 2.0) | 2.0(1.0, 2.0)* | 0.013 |
BMI(kg/m2) | 26.2(24.1, 28.1) | 25.1(23.3, 27.6)* | 25.7(23.5, 27.2) | 0.025 |
胆汁酸异常时胎龄(周) | - | 34.3(30.0, 37.0) | 33.0(24.4, 37.3) | 0.254 |
TBA(μmol/L) | 3.8(2.7, 4.5) | 23.8(15.0, 43.2)* | 21.4(14.5, 31.3)* | <0.01 |
ALT(IU/L) | 12.5(9.0, 14.0) | 46.5(15.3, 159.3)* | 14.0(10.0, 16.0)*# | <0.01 |
AST(IU/L) | 18.0(15.0, 20.0) | 50.5(21.3, 104.3)* | 18.0(15.0, 20.0)# | <0.01 |
TBIL(μmol/L) | 8.2(6.5, 9.0) | 12.3(7.7, 15.5)* | 8.5(7.0, 8.6)*# | <0.01 |
GC(μmol/L) | 2.8(2.2, 3.7) | 18.2(7.9, 35.8)* | 13.2(7.7, 22.6)* | <0.01 |
GDM[例(%)] | 23(11.5) | 26(25.0)* | 58(22.8)* | 0.002 |
脐血流量 | ||||
S/D | 2.1(1.9, 2.3) | 2.4(2.1, 2.7)* | 2.2(2.0, 2.5)*# | <0.01 |
PI | 0.7(0.7, 0.9) | 0.8(0.7, 1.0)* | 0.8(0.7, 0.9)# | 0.002 |
RI | 0.5(0.5, 0.6) | 0.6(0.5, 0.6)* | 0.6(0.5, 0.6) | 0.012 |
早产[例(%)] | 6(3.0) | 30(28.8)* | 47(18.4)*# | <0.01 |
医源性早产 | 0 | 15(14.4)* | 16 (6.3)*# | <0.01 |
自发性早产 | 6(3.0) | 15(14.4)* | 31(12.2)* | 0.001 |
分娩时胎龄(周) | 39.4(38.6, 40.2) | 37.6(36.4, 38.5)* | 38.3(37.2, 39.1)*# | <0.01 |
分娩方式[例(%)] | ||||
剖宫产 | 40(20.0) | 71(68.3)* | 123 (48.2)*# | <0.01 |
阴道助产 | 8(4.0) | 2(1.9) | 6(2.4) | 0.912 |
正常分娩 | 152(76.0) | 31(29.8)* | 126 (49.4)*# | <0.01 |
新生儿体重(g) | 3250(2950, 3450) | 3000(2650, 3200)* | 3000(2700, 3300)* | <0.01 |
新生儿性别(女)[例(%)] | 96(48.0) | 45(43.3) | 124(48.6) | 0.639 |
胎儿宫内窘迫[例(%)] | 31(15.5) | 18(17.3) | 44(17.2) | 0.853 |
羊水异常[例(%)] | 14(7.0) | 21(20.2)* | 26(10.2)# | 0.002 |
MSAF | 11(5.5) | 17(16.4)* | 24(9.4) | 0.008 |
羊水过少 | 3(1.5) | 4(3.8) | 2(0.8) | 0.110 |
新生儿窒息[例(%)] | 3(1.5) | 4(3.8) | 12(4.7) | 0.164 |
项目 | 有症状ICP组 | 无症状ICP组 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
轻度(n=67) | 重度(n =37) | 轻度(n=196) | 重度(n=59) | ||
早发型 | 12(17.9) | 7(18.9) | 45(23.0) | 29(49.2)*#△ | <0.01 |
迟发型 | 55(82.1) | 30(81.1) | 151(76.3) | 30(50.9) | |
分娩方式 | |||||
剖宫产 | 46(68.7) | 27(75.7) | 89(45.4)*# | 39(66.1)△ | <0.01 |
阴道分娩 | 21(31.3) | 10(27.0) | 107(54.6) | 20(33.9) | |
早产 | 15(22.4) | 16(43.2)* | 25(12.8)# | 21(35.6)△ | <0.01 |
医源性早产 | 6(9.0) | 10(27.0)* | 6(3.1)# | 10(17.0)△ | <0.01 |
自发性早产 | 9(13.4) | 6(16.2) | 19(9.7) | 11(18.6) | 0.266 |
胎儿宫内死亡 | 0 | 1(2.7) | 1(0.5) | 0 | 0.285 |
胎儿窘迫 | 13(5.2) | 4(10.8) | 35(17.9) | 6(10.2) | 0.350 |
羊水异常 | 12(17.9) | 10(27.0) | 20(10.2)# | 6(10.2)# | 0.025 |
MSAF | 9(13.4) | 8(21.6) | 19(9.7) | 5(8.5) | 0.161 |
羊水过少 | 3(4.5) | 2(5.4) | 1(0.5) | 1(1.7) | 0.082 |
新生儿窒息 | 4(6.0) | 0 | 8(4.1) | 4(6.8) | 0.400 |
胎儿宫内死亡 | 0 | 1(2.7) | 1(0.5) | 0 | 0.285 |
表2 有症状ICP组与无症状ICP组的临床资料比较[例(%)]
Tab.2 Comparison of clinical data between symptomatic ICP group and asymptomatic ICP group (n,%)
项目 | 有症状ICP组 | 无症状ICP组 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
轻度(n=67) | 重度(n =37) | 轻度(n=196) | 重度(n=59) | ||
早发型 | 12(17.9) | 7(18.9) | 45(23.0) | 29(49.2)*#△ | <0.01 |
迟发型 | 55(82.1) | 30(81.1) | 151(76.3) | 30(50.9) | |
分娩方式 | |||||
剖宫产 | 46(68.7) | 27(75.7) | 89(45.4)*# | 39(66.1)△ | <0.01 |
阴道分娩 | 21(31.3) | 10(27.0) | 107(54.6) | 20(33.9) | |
早产 | 15(22.4) | 16(43.2)* | 25(12.8)# | 21(35.6)△ | <0.01 |
医源性早产 | 6(9.0) | 10(27.0)* | 6(3.1)# | 10(17.0)△ | <0.01 |
自发性早产 | 9(13.4) | 6(16.2) | 19(9.7) | 11(18.6) | 0.266 |
胎儿宫内死亡 | 0 | 1(2.7) | 1(0.5) | 0 | 0.285 |
胎儿窘迫 | 13(5.2) | 4(10.8) | 35(17.9) | 6(10.2) | 0.350 |
羊水异常 | 12(17.9) | 10(27.0) | 20(10.2)# | 6(10.2)# | 0.025 |
MSAF | 9(13.4) | 8(21.6) | 19(9.7) | 5(8.5) | 0.161 |
羊水过少 | 3(4.5) | 2(5.4) | 1(0.5) | 1(1.7) | 0.082 |
新生儿窒息 | 4(6.0) | 0 | 8(4.1) | 4(6.8) | 0.400 |
胎儿宫内死亡 | 0 | 1(2.7) | 1(0.5) | 0 | 0.285 |
TBA (μmol/L) | 有症状ICP围产期发病率 | 无症状ICP围产期发病率 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR值 | P值 | 95%CI | OR值 | P值 | 95%CI | |||
下限 | 上限 | 下限 | 上限 | |||||
10~19.999 | 7.710 | <0.01 | 3.370 | 17.638 | 2.934 | <0.01 | 1.827 | 4.712 |
20~29.999 | 4.681 | 0.001 | 1.853 | 11.829 | 3.755 | <0.01 | 2.135 | 6.606 |
30~39.999 | 7.710 | 0.11 | 1.594 | 37.303 | 1.589 | 0.249 | 0.723 | 3.495 |
≥40 | 12.047 | <0.01 | 4.031 | 36.004 | 6.302 | <0.01 | 2.824 | 14.067 |
表3 ICP围产期发病率的危险因素分析
Tab.3 Risk factors for perinatal morbidity of ICP
TBA (μmol/L) | 有症状ICP围产期发病率 | 无症状ICP围产期发病率 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR值 | P值 | 95%CI | OR值 | P值 | 95%CI | |||
下限 | 上限 | 下限 | 上限 | |||||
10~19.999 | 7.710 | <0.01 | 3.370 | 17.638 | 2.934 | <0.01 | 1.827 | 4.712 |
20~29.999 | 4.681 | 0.001 | 1.853 | 11.829 | 3.755 | <0.01 | 2.135 | 6.606 |
30~39.999 | 7.710 | 0.11 | 1.594 | 37.303 | 1.589 | 0.249 | 0.723 | 3.495 |
≥40 | 12.047 | <0.01 | 4.031 | 36.004 | 6.302 | <0.01 | 2.824 | 14.067 |
[1] |
Arrese M, Macias RI, Briz O, et al. Molecular pathogenesis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. Expert Rev Mol Med, 2008, 10: e9.
doi: 10.1017/S1462399408000628 URL |
[2] |
Lammert F, Marschall HU, Matern S. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol, 2003, 6(2): 123-132.
pmid: 12628071 |
[3] |
Geenes V, Williamson C. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2009, 15(17): 2049-2066.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2049 URL |
[4] |
Glantz A, Marschall HU, Mattsson LA. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Relationships between bile acid levels and fetal complication rates[J]. Hepatology, 2004, 40(2): 467-474.
doi: 10.1002/hep.20336 pmid: 15368452 |
[5] |
Pascual MJ, Serrano MA, El-Mir MY, et al. Relationship between asymptomatic hypercholanaemia of pregnancy and progesterone metabolism[J]. Clin Sci (Lond), 2002, 102(5): 587-593.
doi: 10.1042/cs1020587 URL |
[6] |
Feng D, He W. Asymptomatic elevated total serum bile acids representing an unusual form of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2016, 134(3): 343-344.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.04.004 pmid: 27481015 |
[7] |
Lunzer M, Barnes P, Byth K, et al. Serum bile acid concentrations during pregnancy and their relationship to obstetric cholestasis[J]. Gastroenterology, 1986, 91(4): 825-829.
pmid: 3743960 |
[8] |
Castaño G, Lucangioli S, Sookoian S, et al. Bile acid profiles by capillary electrophoresis in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. Clin Sci (Lond), 2006, 110(4): 459-465.
doi: 10.1042/CS20050302 URL |
[9] | Obstetrics Subgroup, Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (2015)[J]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 2015, 50(7): 481-485. |
[10] | Whittington JR, Allen LR, Ennen CS, et al. Relationship between maternal serum bile acid levels and fetal cardiac troponin-I levels in asymptomatic pregnant patients at term: A cross-sectional observational study[J]. Cureus, 2019, 11(8): e5508. |
[11] |
Alemi F, Kwon E, Poole DP, et al. The TGR5 receptor mediates bile acid-induced itch and analgesia[J]. J Clin Invest, 2013, 123(4): 1513-1530.
doi: 10.1172/JCI64551 pmid: 23524965 |
[12] |
Kondrackiene J, Beuers U, Zalinkevicius R, et al. Predictors of premature delivery in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2007, 13(46): 6226-6230.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i46.6226 URL |
[13] |
Lee NM, Brady CW. Liver disease in pregnancy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2009, 15(8): 897-906.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.897 URL |
[14] |
Mullally BA, Hansen WF. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Review of the literature[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2002, 57(1): 47-52.
doi: 10.1097/00006254-200201000-00023 pmid: 11773831 |
[15] |
Hepburn IS, Schade RR. Pregnancy-associated liver disorders[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2008, 53(9): 2334-2358.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0167-9 URL |
[16] |
Angueira AR, Ludvik AE, Reddy TE, et al. New insights into gestational glucose metabolism: Lessons learned from 21st century approaches[J]. Diabetes, 2015, 64(2): 327-334.
doi: 10.2337/db14-0877 pmid: 25614666 |
[17] |
Men·zyk T, Bator M, Derra A, et al. The role of metabolic disorders in the pathogenesis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. Clin Exp Hepatol, 2018, 4(4): 217-223.
doi: 10.5114/ceh.2018.80122 URL |
[18] |
Liu C, Gao J, Liu J, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2020, 8(23): 1574.
doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4879 pmid: 33437773 |
[19] |
Jain R, Suri V, Chopra S, et al. Obstetric cholestasis: Outcome with active management[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2013, 39(5): 953-959.
doi: 10.1111/jog.12005 URL |
[20] |
Lo JO, Shaffer BL, Allen AJ, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and timing of delivery[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2015, 28(18): 2254-2258.
doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.984605 pmid: 25371372 |
[21] | Puljic A, Kim E, Page J, et al. The risk of infant and fetal death by each additional week of expectant management in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy by gestational age[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212(5): 667. |
[22] |
Arthur C, Mahomed K. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Diagnosis and management; a survey of royal Australian and New Zealand college of obstetrics and gynaecology fellows[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 54(3): 263-267.
doi: 10.1111/ajo.12178 pmid: 24506294 |
[23] | Nichols AA. Cholestasis of pregnancy: A review of the evidence[J]. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs, 2005, 19(3): 217-225. |
[24] |
Mays JK. The active management of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 22(2): 100-103.
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328337238d URL |
[25] |
Floreani A, Gervasi MT. New insights on intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. Clin Liver Dis, 2016, 20(1): 177-189.
doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2015.08.010 pmid: 26593298 |
[26] |
Mozurkewich E, Chilimigras J, Koepke E, et al. Indications for induction of labour: A best-evidence review[J]. BJOG, 2009, 116(5): 626-636.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02065.x URL |
[27] | Menezes EV, Yakoob MY, Soomro T, et al. Reducing stillbirths: Prevention and management of medical disorders and infections during pregnancy[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2009, 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S4. |
[28] |
Henderson CE, Shah RR, Gottimukkala S, et al. Primum non nocere: How active management became modus operandi for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 211(3): 189-196.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.058 pmid: 24704063 |
[29] |
Girling JC, Dow E, Smith JH. Liver function tests in pre-eclampsia: Importance of comparison with a reference range derived for normal pregnancy[J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1997, 104(2): 246-250.
pmid: 9070148 |
[30] |
Zecca E, De Luca D, Baroni S, et al. Bile acid-induced lung injury in newborn infants: A bronchoalveolar lavage fluid study[J]. Pediatrics, 2008, 121(1): e146-149.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1220 URL |
[31] |
Vasavan T, Deepak S, Jayawardane IA, et al. Fetal cardiac dysfunction in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with elevated serum bile acid concentrations[J]. J Hepatol, 2021, 74(5): 1087-1096.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.038 URL |
[32] |
Madazli R, Yuksel MA, Oncul M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2015, 35(4): 358-361.
doi: 10.3109/01443615.2014.968102 pmid: 25384180 |
[33] | Estiú MC, Frailuna MA, Otero C, et al. Relationship between early onset severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and higher risk of meconium-stained fluid[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(4): e0176504. |
[34] |
Piechota J, Jelski W. Intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy: Review of the literature[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(5): 1361.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9051361 URL |
[35] |
Yule CS, Holcomb DS, Kraus AC, et al. Cholestasis: A prospective study of perinatal outcomes and time to symptom improvement[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2021, 38(5): 414-420.
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717076 URL |
[1] | 陈永立;高慧;崔颖;杨凤香. 妊娠期急性呼吸系统感染治疗前后振动反应成像的变化[J]. 临床荟萃, 2014, 29(12): 1405-1406. |
[2] | 顾梅青;凌万里;陶黎梅;钱建青;陆美华;周剑峰. 孕妇血与新生儿脐血血红蛋白、铁蛋白关系的研究[J]. 临床荟萃, 2014, 29(1): 74-75. |
[3] | 高惠丽;张志勇;高慧;于四勇. 孕妇妊娠期肺炎对胎儿的影响[J]. 临床荟萃, 2013, 28(6): 662-663. |
[4] | 刘新军;米永峰;李会文;王玉红. 急诊抢救孕妇重症低血钾1例[J]. 临床荟萃, 2013, 28(1): 104-105. |
[5] | 吴宝利;郑晓丽;汪良芝. 血清总胆汁酸、肝纤维化指标与肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血的关系[J]. 临床荟萃, 2012, 27(3): 222-223. |
[6] | 高建民;叶景郁. 抗瘙痒中药复方药浴治疗尿毒症皮肤瘙痒21例[J]. 临床荟萃, 2012, 27(3): 257-258. |
[7] | 王平;赵洪东. 成功抢救甲型H1N1流感合并重症成人呼吸窘迫综合征孕妇1例[J]. 临床荟萃, 2011, 26(4): 360-0. |
[8] | 原源;谭星宇;高占成. 围生期多发性脑结核瘤1例诊治和文献分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2011, 26(18): 1646-1648. |
[9] | 白淑芬;杨立新;唐迅;王艳. 乙型肝炎病毒感染孕妇的新生儿血清病毒标志物分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2011, 26(14): 1244-1245. |
[10] | 王丽春;李大江;吕晓菊. 麻疹孪生球菌致孕妇败血症1例[J]. 临床荟萃, 2008, 23(8): 597-597. |
[11] | 陈静;秦淑辉;张跃霞. 新生儿溶血病产前免疫抗体监测分析鲻[J]. 临床荟萃, 2007, 22(16): 1187-1187. |
[12] | 辛素霞;王晓明;贾莉;任军英;赵秋芝. 血清总胆汁酸测定对婴儿肝炎综合征的诊疗价值[J]. 临床荟萃, 2007, 22(16): 1166-1167. |
[13] | 周艾琳;王海波;高飞;范敏;邢玲. 哺乳期产妇四亚甲二砜四胺中毒8例临床分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2003, 18(20): 1190-1190. |
[14] | 施汉愚. 慢性肝炎血清胆汁酸测定的临床意义[J]. 临床荟萃, 2002, 17(7): 407-407. |
[15] | 李明林;李世平;赵亚一. 围产期脑脊髓血管病108例临床与CT研究分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2002, 17(21): 1250-1251. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||