临床荟萃 ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 244-248.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2024.03.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京市西城区不同结核病防治体系收治肺结核患者治疗管理情况分析

孟炜丽()   

  1. 北京市西城区疾病预防控制中心 结核病防治科,北京 100120
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-22 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 孟炜丽 E-mail:sleepmwl@163.com

Clinical management for tuberculosis patients managed by different prevention and treatment systems in the Xicheng District in Beijing

Meng Weili()   

  1. Department of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Beijing Xicheng District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100120, China
  • Received:2023-07-22 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-06-12
  • Contact: Meng Weili E-mail:sleepmwl@163.com

摘要:

目的 分析北京市西城区不同结核病防治体系模式中,收治肺结核患者间的差异,为做好肺结核患者治疗管理提供参考依据。方法 从中国疾病预防控制信息系统导出2016年1月1日至2019年6月30日,现管理单位为北京市西城区结核病防治所的肺结核患者的资料。按现诊断单位将患者分为防治管一体组和三位一体组,对两组基本信息和临床特征进行回顾性分析。结果 1000例患者纳入本研究,现诊断单位为西城区结核病防治所的为防治管一体组,现诊断单位为北京市级结核病防治所和市级定点医院的为三位一体组。防治管一体组385例(38.50%),三位一体组615例(61.50%)。防治管一体组全程查痰比例、采用标准化方案比例高于三位一体组(48.57% vs 23.90%,69.61% vs 51.06%),防治管一体组治愈率、成功治疗率高于三位一体组(32.21% vs 16.75%,95.06% vs 83.41%),两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。防治管一体组有病原学结果比例高于三位一体组(89.61% vs 83.09%),三位一体组0月序有分子生物学结果比例高于防治管一体组(28.46% vs 18.70%),两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 三位一体模式管理肺结核患者0月序有分子生物学结果比例高, 存在不规范、不良转归多等问题,需要采取措施来提高患者治疗效果。

关键词: 结核,肺, 体系, 预防, 治疗, 管理

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the differences in clinical management for tuberculosis (TB) patients managed by different prevention and treatment systems in the Xicheng District in Beijing, thus providing references for the clinical management for TB. Methods Clinical data of TB patients who were managed by the Tuberculosis Prevention Institute of Xicheng District from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2019 were downloaded from China Information System for Diseases Control and Prevention. Patients were divided into the integrated group of “prevention, treatment and control” and the trinity group according to the current diagnosis unit. The basic information and clinical characteristics of the two groups were analyzed retrospectively. Results A total of 1, 000 patients were included in this study, with 385 cases (38.50%) managed in the Tuberculosis Prevention Institute of Xicheng District as the integrated group of “prevention, treatment and control”, and 615 cases (61.50%) managed in the Beijing Municipal tuberculosis Prevention and Control Institute and Municipal Designated Hospital as the trinity group. The proportion of whole-process sputum examination in the integrated group was significantly higher than that of the trinity group (48.57% vs 23.90%, P<0.05). The proportion of standardized schemes in the integrated group was significantly higher than that of the trinity group (69.61% vs 51.06%, P<0.05). The rates of cure and treatment success in the integrated group were significantly higher than those of the trinity group (32.21% vs 16.75%,95.06% vs 83.41%; P<0.05). The proportion of patients with etiological results in the integrated group was significantly higher than that of the trinity group (89.61% vs 83.09%, P<0.05). The proportion of patients with molecular biology results in the 0 month sequence in the trinity group was significantly higher than that of the integrated group (28.46% vs 18.70%, P<0.05). Conclusion The proportion of patients with molecular biology results in the 0 month sequence in the trinity group is higher. The trinity mode has problems like non-standard management and adverse outcome. Measures need to be taken to improve the therapeutic effect of TB patients.

Key words: tuberculosis, pulmonary, system, prevention, treatment, management

中图分类号: