临床荟萃

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

256层与128层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影壁冠状动脉狭窄程度的对照性研究

  

  1. 1.北戴河医院CT室, 河北  北戴河 066100;2.唐山工人医院 CT室, 河北 唐山 063000;
    3.秦皇岛市第一医院 CT室, 河北 秦皇岛 066000
  • 出版日期:2016-10-05 发布日期:2016-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 通信作者:王玉君,Email:568253944@qq.com

Comparison of stenosis degree of mural coronary artery between 128slice and 256slice spiral  CT

  1. 1.Department of CT, Beidaihe Hospital,  Beidaihe 066100,China;
    2.Department of CT, Tangshan Workers'  Hospital, Tangshan  063000,China;
    3. Department of CT,  Qinhuangdao First Hospital,  Qinhuangdao 066000,China
  • Online:2016-10-05 Published:2016-10-11
  • Contact: Corresponding author:Wang Yujun,Email:568253944@qq.com

摘要: 目的探讨256层与128层螺旋CT冠脉造影在舒张后期壁冠状动脉狭窄程度的差异性分析。方法采用多中心研究方式,对存在完全型心肌桥患者作为研究对象,随机收集2014~2016年间256层CT 113例,128层CT 151例,共264例,冠状动脉血管造影术(CTA)检出心肌桥279支,其中男149例,女115例,年龄27~87岁,主要通过分析曲面重建(curved planar reformation, CPR)、多平面重组(multiplanar reformation, MPR)、最大密度投影(maximum intensity projection, MIP) 图像,测量MB厚度及长度,MCA的桥前段、桥下段及桥后段管径,计算壁冠状动脉的狭窄程度。分析256层与128层螺旋CT在舒张后期壁冠状动脉狭窄程度的差异。结果128层CT与256层CT冠脉造影在心肌桥厚度总体存在显著差异(P<0.01),而在心肌桥厚度≥3.2  mm组两组数据差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);128层CT与256层CT在心肌桥长度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);128层CT与256层CT在舒张后期壁冠状动脉狭窄程度差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),而在壁冠状动脉狭窄程度≥13%,两组数据差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对128层螺旋CT和256层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影对照分析,心肌桥厚度≥3.2 mm和壁冠状动脉狭窄程度≥13%的心肌桥壁冠状动脉,256层CT与128层螺旋CT差异无统计学意义,128层螺旋CT冠脉造影完全能满足临床需要。

关键词: 冠状动脉疾病;心肌桥;体层摄影术, X线计算机

Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the stenosis degree of mural coronary artery and myocardial bridge thickness of 128slice spiral coronary CTA with those of 256slice spiral coronary CTA,and to evaluate the difference of 128slice spiral CT and 256slice spiral CT.MethodsThe study collected 279 myocardial bridges at multicenter,totally 256 patients with the perfect form myocardial bridges,149 of them were male,115 of them were female, age from 27 to 87 years old. The analysis was made in the image of curved planar reformation(CPR), multiplanar reformation (MPR), maximum intensity projection(MIP), the thickness and length of myocardial bridge, the pipe diameter of front and below and after the bridge section were measured,the degree of coronary artery stenosis was calculated. The stenosis degree of mural coronary artery and the thickness of myocardial bridge were calculated and measured. 128 and 256 slice spiral coronary were evaluated in the difference between the above indexes. ResultsThere was significant difference (P<0.01)  between the total myocardial bridge thickness with 128slice CT and 256slice CT, but in the thickness of myocardial bridge ≥3.2  mm,the two methods showed no significant difference(P>0.05);There was no significant difference between the myocardial bridge length with 128slice CT and 256slice CT (P>0.05). There was significant difference between the stenosis degree of mural coronary artery between the two methods (P<0.01),but in the stenosis degree of mural coronary artery ≥13%, there was no significant difference between the two methods(P>0.05). ConclusionWhen the thickness of myocardial bridge ≥3.2  mm or the stenosis degree of mural coronary artery ≥13%, 256slice CT is similar to  128slice CT, so 128silce CT can completely meet the clinical necessity.

Key words: coronary disease, myocardial bridge, tomomgraphy, Xray computer