临床荟萃

• 专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

重症脓毒症患者外周血免疫因子的表达及临床意义

  

  1. 武威市人民医院 a.康复科;b.重症医学科,甘肃  武威 733000
  • 出版日期:2018-07-05 发布日期:2018-08-06
  • 通讯作者: 通信作者:张晓莉, Email: xiaoli0208@163.com
  • 作者简介:徐瑞山,武威市人民医院康复医学科主任,主治医师,从事临床医疗工作25年余。2004年在省人民医院心内科进修学习,2006年在中日友好医院重症医学科进修学习,2015年在省康复中心医院进修学习康复专业,临床工作经验丰富,业务能力强,在心血管疾病的诊治及急危、重症病人的救治方面积累了丰富的临床经验。

Expression and clinical significance of peripheral blood immune factors in patients with severe sepsis

  1. a.Department of Rehabilitation;  b.Emergency ICU,  Wuwei People's Hospital,   Wuwei  733000,China
  • Online:2018-07-05 Published:2018-08-06
  • Contact: Corresponding author: Zhang Xiaoli, Email: xiaoli0208@163.com

摘要: 目的 探究重症脓毒症患者外周血免疫因子的表达水平及在预测预后中的价值。方法 对2015年6月至2017年12月我院诊治的90例重症脓毒症患者的免疫因子水平进行分析,根据30天预后情况分为生存组(65例)和死亡组(25例)。比较两组患者的临床资料、急性生理与慢性健康评分Ⅱ(Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, APACHE Ⅱ)、序贯脓毒血症相关性器官功能衰竭评分(sequential organ failure assessment, SOFA)、血清降钙素原(Procalcitonin,PCT)及白介素6(Interleukin,IL6)、IL10、IL18、肿瘤坏死因子α(tumor necrosis factor,TNFα)和转化生长因子(transforming growth factor,TGFβ1)等外周血免疫因子表达水平差异。应用受试者工作曲线评价上述指标在预测重症脓毒症患者预后中的效能。结果 死亡组APACHE Ⅱ、SOFA以及血清PCT、IL6、IL18明显高于生存组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Person相关分析显示,IL6、IL18与APACHE Ⅱ评分(r=0.679, 0.651)、SOFA评分(r=0.643, 0.630)和PCT(r=0.711, 0.678)均存在明显的相关性。ROC曲线显示,应用IL6和IL18预测重症脓毒症患者预后的曲线下面积较高(AUC=0.841,0.802),其次为PCT和APACHEⅡ评分(AUC=0.710, 0.685),SOFA评分较低(AUC=0.648);应用IL6和IL18联合诊断后诊断效能得到明显提高(AUC=0.909)。应用IL6联合IL18预测重症脓毒症患者预后的敏感性和阴性预测值分别为96.00%和98.04%,均明显高于SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分和PCT,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 重症脓毒症患者外周血免疫因子的表达存在明显异常,外周血IL和IL18水平可预测重症脓毒症的死亡风险,有较高的诊断效能。

关键词: 脓毒症, 预后, 白细胞介素6, 白细胞介素18

Abstract: Objective  To explore the expression of peripheral blood immune factors in patients with severe sepsis and its value in predicting the prognosis of patients. Methods  The immune factors of 90 patients with severe sepsis who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital from June 2015 to December 2017 were divided into survival group (65 cases) and death group (25 cases) according to the prognosis. The clinical data, APACHEⅡ, SOFA, procalcitonin(PCT) serological indexes and the expression of peripheral blood immune factors (such as interleukin6,  interleukin10,  interleukin18,  tumor necrosis factorα  and transforming growth factorβ1) were compared between the two groups. And the receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to the effectiveness evaluation  of the above three factors in predicting the prognosis of the patients.Results  The APACHE Ⅱ score,  SOFA score,  PCT and IL18 of death group were significantly higher than those of  the survival group (P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that IL6 and IL18 were significantly correlated with APACHE Ⅱ score (r=0.679,  0.651),  SOFA score (r=0.643,  0.630) and PCT (r=0.711, 0.678). The ROC curve showed that the area under the curve(AUC) for predicting prognosis of  the patients using IL6 and IL18 (AUC=0.841,  0.802) were higher,  followed by PCT and APACHEⅡ scores (AUC=0.710 and 0.685), and the SOFA score was relatively lower (AUC=0.648). The combined diagnosis of IL6 and IL18 significantly improved the diagnostic efficiency (AUC=0.909). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of IL6 and IL18 in prognosis of patients with severe sepsis were significantly higher than those of SOFA,  APACHEⅡ score and PCT (P<0.05). Conclusion  There is obvious anomaly in the expression of peripheral blood immune factors in the patients.  The IL6 and IL18 have high diagnostic efficacy in predicting the death of patients with severe sepsis.

Key words: sepsis, prognosis, interleukin6, interleukin18