临床荟萃 ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 403-406.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2016.04.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

替格瑞洛治疗氯吡格雷低反应患者的有效性及安全性分析

刘晓雨, 贾国伟, 孙荣国, 张巍, 马博聪, 赵明, 张红斌   

  1. 沧州市中心医院 心脏内三科,河北 沧州 061001
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-25 出版日期:2016-04-05 发布日期:2016-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 张巍,Email:xinnei3ke@163.com

Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor treated on patients with low clopidogrel response

Liu Xiaoyu, Jia Guowei, Sun Rongguo, Zhang Wei, Ma Bocong, Zhao Ming, Zhang Hongbin   

  1. Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou 061001, China
  • Received:2015-11-25 Online:2016-04-05 Published:2016-04-18
  • Contact: Zhang Wei, Email: xinnei3ke@163.com

摘要: 目的 观察替格瑞洛对氯吡格雷低反应急性冠状动脉综合征(acute coronary syndromes,ACS)患者治疗的有效性及安全性。方法 选择2013年1月至2014年6月应用氯吡格雷75 mg/d治疗的ACS经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后患者493例,用血栓弹力图测定血小板聚集率,根据血小板聚集率筛选出氯吡格雷低反应患者173例,采用数字随机法分为氯吡格雷组(n=87)和替格瑞洛组(n=86)。氯吡格雷组继续服用氯吡格雷(75 mg/d),替格瑞洛组将氯吡格雷替换为替格瑞洛(90 mg,2次/d)。主要终点事件为治疗3天、7天、30天二磷酸腺苷(ADP)诱导的血小板聚集率变化情况,次要终点事件为主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)及出血的发生率。结果 替格瑞洛组3天、7天、30天血小板聚集率分别为(56.7±12.5)%、(54.1±12.3)%、(53.2±15.3)%显著低于氯吡格雷组(87.7±14.3)%、(85.4±12.7)、(84.9±10.7)%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。对所有患者随访12个月,替格瑞洛组MACCE及出血的发生率显著低于氯吡格雷组(P<0.05)。而两组出血发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 对于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的氯吡格雷低反应患者接受替格瑞洛治疗后能获得理想的抗血小板效果,且替格瑞洛是有效、安全可信赖的药物。

关键词: 急性冠状动脉综合征, 替格瑞洛, 氯吡格雷, 血小板聚集, 血栓弹力描记术

Abstract: Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor treated on patients with low clopidogrel response.Methods A total of 173 of 493 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)with acute coronary syndrome(ACS) were selected as low colpidogrel response identified by thrombelastography and enrolled in this study. Patients with low clopidogrel response were randomized into clopidogrel treated group(n=87) and ticagrelor treated group(n=86). Patients responding to clopidogrel were still treated with clopidogrel(75 mg daily)and patients with low clopidogrel response received ticagrelor treatment(90 mg twice daily). Platelet aggregation rate was compared between two groups after treatment for 3 days, 7 days and 30 days. All patients were followed 12 months for major adverse cardiovascular events(MACCE) and bleeding events.Results Patients in ticagrelor treated group showed significantly lower platelet aggregation rate compared with patients in clopidogrel treated group after 3 days, 7 days, and 30 days (P<0.05). Patients in ticagrelor treated group showed significantly lower MACCE rate compared with patients in clopidogrel treated group in the postoperative 12 months' follow-up(P<0.05). There were no significant difference in bleeding events(P>0.05).Conclusion Ticagrelor therapy can achieve ideal antiplatelet effects for patients with low clopidogrel response. For the patients with low clopidogrel response receiving PCI, ticagrelor can be an effecive and safe choice for antiplatelet therary.

Key words: acute coronary syndrome, platelet aggregation, thrombelastography, ticagrelor, clopidogrel

中图分类号: