Clinical Focus

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Curative effect of CAG regimen compared with CAG combined with decitabine regimen in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

  

  1. Department of Hematology, Tianjin First Central Hospital,   Tianjin   300192,   China
  • Online:2018-03-05 Published:2018-03-19
  • Contact: Corresponding author: Bai Xue, Email: baixue0305@126.com

Abstract: Objective  To compare the curative effect of CAG regimen and CAG combined with decitabine regimen in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia(AML). Methods  Seventysix de novo elderly patients with AML who were diagnosed in our hospital were analyzed by a retrospective analysis. The 76 cases were divided into groups with CAG group and CAG+DAC group according to different chemotherapies.  We compared the differences of complete remission rate, overall response rate, median overall survival and median relapsefree survival in two groups. Results  CAG group of 49 cases:CR rate was 51.0%, ORR was 61.2%; CAG+DAC group of 27 cases: CR rate was 59.3%, ORR was 77.8%. The statistics analysis showed  no significant differences in CR rate and ORR between two groups(P>0.05). There were differences in median OS (10.0 months vs 12.0 months) and median RFS (8.0 months vs 11.0  months ) in  two groups(P>0.05). But in the highrisk group of patients, CR rate and ORR of the CAG+DAC group  were  higher  than  those of CAG group,respectively (57.1% vs 15%; 71.4% vs 25%), the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). CAG+DAC group was better than CAG group in median OS and median RFS, respectively (6.0 months vs 10.0  months) and (4.0 months vs 7.0 months)(P>0.05). Conclusion  CAG regimen is similar with CAG+DAC regimen in the clinical curative effect, but CAG+DAC regimen is better in the elderly patients with AML with poor prognosis.

Key words: leukemia, myeloid; , decitabine, curative , effect