临床荟萃 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 526-531.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2023.06.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

承德地区EB病毒感染和传染性单核细胞增多症患儿临床特点

肖梦1, 程婷婷1, 马倩格1, 冯晓颖2, 李利华2, 李涛2()   

  1. 1.承德医学院第二临床学院,河北 承德 067000
    2.承德市中心医院 儿科,河北 承德 067000
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-02 出版日期:2023-06-20 发布日期:2023-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 李涛,Email: litao838@163.com

Clinical characteristics and laboratory examination of Epstein-Barr virus infection and infectious mononucleosis in Chengde

Xiao Meng1, Cheng Tingting1, Ma Qiange1, Feng Xiaoying2, Li Lihua2, Li Tao2()   

  1. 1. The Second Clinical Medical College of Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, China
    2. Department of Pediatrics, Chengde Central Hospital, Chengde 067000, China
  • Received:2022-11-02 Online:2023-06-20 Published:2023-08-18
  • Contact: Li Tao, Email: litao838@163.com

摘要:

目的 探究Epstein-Barr病毒(Epstein-Barr virus,EBV)感染和传染性单核细胞增多症(infectious mononucleosis,IM)患儿临床特点。方法 回顾性分析承德市中心医院于2021年1月至2022年7月收治的EBV感染和IM感染患儿共72例,分为EBV感染组( n =37)和IM组( n =35),比较两组临床资料。结果 ①一般资料:两组性别、年龄、热峰差异均无统计学意义( P >0.05);与IM组比较,EBV感染组发热时间较短,差异有统计学意义( P <0.05)。②首发症状:两组均多以发热为首发症状,首发症状发生率差异无统计学意义( P >0.05)。③临床表现:两组淋巴结肿大、皮疹、咽峡炎发生率差异均无统计学意义( P >0.05);与IM组比较,EBV感染组咽痛、眼睑水肿、肝脏肿大、脾脏肿大、发热的发生率较低,差异均有统计学意义( P <0.05)。④实验室检查:两组共有20例患者接受了单纯疱疹病毒、巨细胞病毒、风疹病毒、肺炎支原体、腺病毒检测。所有接受检测血清病毒学的患儿均检出风疹病毒,检出巨细胞病毒感染17例,发生率为85%;两组淋巴细胞百分比、单核细胞百分比、丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶差异均无统计学意义( P >0.05);与IM组比较,EBV感染组白细胞计数较高,异型淋巴细胞百分比和乳酸脱氢酶较低,差异均有统计学意义( P <0.05);IM组共有19例患儿接受了免疫学检测,其中有14例(73.7%)血清免疫球蛋白E高于正常;EBV组有9例接受了免疫学检测,其中8例(88.9%)血清免疫球蛋白E高于正常。两组免疫球蛋白E高于正常的发生率差异无统计学意义( P =0.630)。⑤ 并发症:与IM组比较,EBV感染组并发呼吸道感染的发生率更低,差异有统计学意义( P <0.05),其他系统(血液系统、肝脏、肾脏、心肌、消化道)并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义( P >0.05)。结论 EBV感染与IM临床特点不一,临床医师应重点关注咽痛、眼睑水肿、肝脏肿大、脾脏肿大、发热等临床表现及白细胞计数、乳酸脱氢酶、异型淋巴细胞百分比等实验室检查。

关键词: 疱疹病毒4型, 人, 传染性单核细胞增多症, 儿童, 临床表现

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical characteristics of children with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and infectious mononucleosis (IM). Methods A total of 72 children with EBV infection and IM infection admitted to Chengde Central Hospital from January 2021 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into EBV infection group ( n =37) and IM group ( n =35), and the clinical data of the two groups were compared.Resultss (1) General data: there were no significant differences in gender, age and peak temperature between the two groups ( P >0.05). Compared with that in IM group, the fever time in EBV infection group was significantly shorter ( P <0.05). (2) Initial symptom: fever was the initial symptom in both groups, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of initial symptom between the two groups ( P >0.05). (3) Clinical manifestations: there was no significant difference in the incidence of lymph node enlargement, rash and angina between the two groups ( P >0.05). Compared with that in the IM group, the EBV infection group had a significantly lower incidence of sore throat, eyelid edema, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and fever ( P <0.05). (4) Laboratory tests: a total of 20 patients in the two groups received laboratory testing of herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, rubella virus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and adenovirus. Rubella virus was detected in all children who received serum virology test, and 17/20 (85%) children were detected with cytomegalovirus infection. There were no significant differences in the percentage of lymphocytes, and monocytes, as well as alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels between the two groups ( P >0.05). Compared with those in the IM group, the white blood cell count in the EBV infection group was significantly higher, the percentage of abnormal lymphocyte and lactate dehydrogenase were significantly lower ( P <0.05). A total of 19 children in the IM group received immunological tests, and 14/19 (73.7%) had elevated serum immunoglobulin E levels. Nine patients in the EBV group received immunological tests, and 8/9 (88.9%) had elevated serum immunoglobulin E levels. There was no significant difference in the incidence of a higher-than-normal range of immunoglobulin E between the two groups ( P =0.630). (5) Complications: compared with IM group, the incidence of respiratory tract infection in EBV infection group was significantly lower ( P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications of other systems (blood system, liver, kidney, myocardium, digestive tract) ( P >0.05).Conclusion The clinical features of EBV infection differ from those of IM in children. Clinical manifestations like sore throat, eyelid edema, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, fever, and laboratory tests of white blood cell count, lactate dehydrogenase, and percentage of lymphocytes should be well concerned in children.

Key words: herperirus rype 4, infectious mononucleosis, child, clinical manifestations

中图分类号: