临床荟萃 ›› 2015, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 1226-1239.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

强化降压是否有益的 Meta 分析

耿雪;崔炜   

  1. 河北医科大学第二医院 河北省心血管病研究所 心内一科,河北 石家庄,050000
  • 出版日期:2015-11-05 发布日期:2015-11-05

Is aggressive antihypertension beneficial? a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Geng Xue;Cui Wei   

  • Online:2015-11-05 Published:2015-11-05

摘要: 目的:评价当人群血压达到140/90 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)以下时,继续降压是否有益。方法检索 Pubmed、EMBASE 数据库。入选试验满足条件:试验为随机对照试验,试验终点人群平均血压<140/90 mmHg,两组间终点血压差异有统计学意义。采用比值比(OR )和95%可信区间(95% CI )作为评价强化降压组和常规治疗组各种临床结局有无差异的指标。统计学分析应用 RevMan 5.0软件。结果在检索到的文章中共有44个试验满足条件,总计193772例患者。当血压降到140/90 mmHg 以下时,继续降压可减少总病死率(OR =0.89,95% CI =0.85~0.94)、心血管病死率(OR =0.87,95% CI =0.80~0.94)、心血管事件发生率(OR =0.79,95% CI =0.70~0.89)、心肌梗死发生率(OR =0.89,95% CI =0.80~0.99)、非致死性心肌梗死发生率(OR =0.86,95% CI =0.79~0.94)、脑卒中发生率(OR =0.84,95% CI =0.79~0.89),但同时增加了低血压发生率(OR =2.63,95% CI =1.87~3.71)、高钾血症发生率(OR =2.24,95% CI =1.49~3.38),而致死性脑卒中发生率(OR =0.73,95% CI =0.52~1.03)、肾衰竭发生率(OR =2.01,95% CI =0.99~4.08)两组间差异无统计学意义。选择强化降压组血压<130/80 mmHg 的试验进行亚组分析,强化降压和常规降压组间总病死率(OR =1.02,95% CI =0.89~1.17)、心血管病死率(OR =0.96,95% CI =0.70~1.30)、心肌梗死发生率(OR =0.97,95% CI =0.75~1.25),差异无统计学意义,但强化降压可以减少脑卒中发生率(OR =0.63,95% CI =0.47~0.84),心血管事件发生率(OR =0.87,95% CI =0.79~0.96)。结论无论人群基础血压高低,当血压降到140/90 mmHg 以下时,继续降压可以减少人群总病死率和心血管事件发生率,但同时增加了低血压等不良事件的发生率,而血压降到130/80 mmHg 时,继续降压不能减少总病死率和心血管死亡、心肌梗死发生率,但仍可以减少脑卒中发生率。

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Objective To evaluate the efficacy of aggressive antihypertensive treatment in patients when achieved blood pressure (BP)is less than 140/90 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa).Methods We performed PUBMED, EMBASE searches for randomized antihypertensive cl

Key words: blood pressure, cardiovascular events, meta-analyses

中图分类号: